Amend the Constitution to secure citizenship for foreign-born children ― Hafiz Hassan

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates.


SEPTEMBER 24 ― The Constitution of the Republic of Singapore provides for four types of citizenship, one which is citizenship by descent. It is citizenship by operation of law in our Federal Constitution.

Before May 15, 2004 the Singapore Constitutional provision ― Article 122 ― reads as follows:

“122. Citizenship by descent

(1)  A person born outside Singapore after 16th September 1963 shall be a citizen of Singapore by descent if at the time of the birth his father is a citizen of Singapore, by birth or by registration:

Provided that such person shall not be a citizen of Singapore by descent unless his birth is registered in the prescribed manner at the Registry of Citizens or at a diplomatic or consular mission of Singapore within one year of its occurrence or, with the permission of the Government, later:

And provided further that where such person is born of a father who is a citizen of Singapore by registration at the time of the birth, he would not acquire the citizenship of that country in which he was born by reason of his birth in that country.”

Accordingly, a child is entitled to citizenship by descent only when the father is a Singaporean who is a citizen by birth or registration. It did not apply when the father is a Singapore citizen by descent, or when it is the mother who is a Singaporean.

Importantly, Singaporean mothers could only pass on citizenship by registration to their foreign-born children, and citizenship by registration is not conferred as a matter of right.

In short, Singaporean mothers did not stand on the same legal footing as Singaporean fathers.

The corresponding provision in the Federal Constitution is in the Second Schedule, Part II. Clause 1 reads as follows:

“Subject to the provisions of Part III of this Constitution, the following persons born on or after Malaysia Day are citizens by operation of law, that is to say:

(a) every person born within the Federation of whose parents one at least is at the time of the birth either a citizen or permanently resident in the Federation;

(b) every person born outside the Federation whose father is at the time of the birth a citizen and either was born in the Federation or is at the time of the birth in the service of the Federation or of a State.”

By the above provision, Malaysian mothers similarly can only pass on citizenship by registration to their foreign-born children under Article 15(2) of the Federal Constitution. And citizenship by registration is not conferred as a matter of right as the word used in the provision is “may” and not “shall.”

That is why the decision of High Court judge Akhtar Tahir has been much applauded. The learned judge ruled that children born overseas to Malaysian mothers are entitled to citizenship by operation of law.

The learned judge ruled, among others, that the word “father” in Clause 1(b) above includes “mother.” He gave a “harmonious” reading of the Constitutional provisions.

But arguably, the learned judge may have stepped into the shoes of the legislature (Parliament) by ruling that the word “father” includes “mother.” If the framers of the Constitution had intended that Clause 1(b) above to include “mother”, then it would have been worded similarly like Clause 1(a), that is:

“every person born outside the Federation of whose parents one at least is at the time of the birth a citizen and either was born in the Federation or is at the time of the birth in the service of the Federation or of a State.” (Emphasis added)

But why in Clause 1(b) it is “father” instead of “of whose parents one at least”? The framers of the Constitution must have intended to exclude “mother.”

This explains why Singapore took the route of Constitutional amendments to allow Singaporean mothers to pass on citizenship by descent to their foreign-born children. This makes the grant of citizenship by descent gender neutral. Article 122(1), after the amendments which came into effect on May 15, 2004, now reads as follow:

“Subject to clauses (2) and (3), a person born outside Singapore after 16th September 1963 shall be a citizen of Singapore by descent if, at the time of his birth —

(a)  where the person is born before the date of commencement of section 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Act 2004, his father is a citizen of Singapore, by birth or registration; and

(b)  where the person is born on or after the date of commencement of section 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Act 2004, either his father or mother is a citizen of Singapore, by birth, registration or descent. (Emphasis added)”

Let’s urge our ‘Keluarga Malaysia’ government to draft amendments to the relevant Constitutional provisions on citizenship. ― Reuters pic
Let’s urge our ‘Keluarga Malaysia’ government to draft amendments to the relevant Constitutional provisions on citizenship. ― Reuters pic

The way forward for us, therefore, is to amend the Federal Constitution to secure citizenship for foreign-born children whose mothers are the pillars of “Keluarga Malaysia.”

Much as one may applaud the decision of Justice Akhtar Tahir, it is importantly not binding on other High Court judges. Another High Court judge may interpret the constitutional provisions differently from Justice Akhtar.

Many have urged the government to withdraw its appeal against Justice Akhtar's decision.

Let’s urge our “Keluarga Malaysia” government to draft amendments to the relevant Constitutional provisions on citizenship. And let’s have bipartisan support for the amendments.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

You May Also Like

Related Articles