OCTOBER 23 — Malaysia works on five social contracts beyond the Federal Constitution.

The first, while richly storied but hardly shared in daily conversations, involves a delegation led by the late Tunku Abdul Rahman, with Tun HS Lee and Tun Sambathan in tow, to urge London to agree to a peaceful transition of power.

That led to the country's independence on August 31 1957, only to be joined by Sabah and Sarawak on September 16, 1963. Had Singapore not been expelled from Malaysia in 1965, they too would be part of the social contract, as the gentlemen's agreement in London was to grant legal citizenships to all Malayans and/or Malaysians.

The second social contract involves the importance of “Rukun Negara,” the national governing principles in 1970, which among others acknowledge the belief in God by all races. The original formulation of Rukun Negara, until this day, speaks positively of liberalism in the context of progressive politics; an element which Professor Chandra Muzaffar noted has been intentionally neglected over the last 20 years.

Advertisement

The third social contract, involves a colour blind affirmative action, in the form of National Economic Policy (NEP) between 1979-1990. Unfortunately, NEP while still in existence has been impoverished by the kleptocracy of the previous regime; to the degree where even Mara cannot afford to send more Malay students abroad.

Even its own Mara digital mall is suffering a terrible run of business due to poor execution. The policies are mostly nice and good with noble intentions but unfortunately the execution is far from satisfactory resulting in few hijacking the fruits.

The fourth social contract involves the agreement to respect the royalties and vice versa. The Sultans, including, the governors in states like Sabah and Sarawak, would to the best of the abilities maintain the rich diversity in various states, in every sense.

Advertisement

The final social contract, according to my favourite, Professor KS Jomo, would have Wawasan 2020, where all races ideally see themselves as Malaysians, with equitable income and comfortable social safety net to cushion their retirements and health care benefits in old age.

Vision 2020 was the idea mooted by then and current PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

By 2023, more than 15 per cent of Malaysia's total population would be over the age of 60; which effectively makes Malaysia an ageing society by the definition of the United Nations.

All the social contracts are the key edifice of Malaysia. But as can be seen from the fifth and final one, economic prosperity is a “black swan event.” No one predicted, or knew, by 2018, that China would reach such a level of economic sophistication to compete head to head with the United States; so much so that they are now trapped in a high tech trade conflict.

Malaysia cannot move forward based on the regurgitation or repetition of the five social contracts only. That would be akin to using the economic and political model of 1950-2000 to steer the country forward.

Old solutions cannot and must not be used to solve current or new challenges in 2019 simply because it is devoid of simple logic of suitability.

Governance, according to Professor B. Jessop, is indeed “steering” beyond “who gets what, when, and how,” a definition by Professor Harold Lasswell. It is also beyond what the late Professor David Easton called “the authoritative allocation of values.”

Governance, ironical as it may sound, involves what Professor Alex Callinicoss called “abolition of politics.” In fact, the original view of Karl Marx called for a state that can abolish “politics” too. That is, of course, a Utopia and true enough, Soviet Union collapsed by 1990.

If Malaysia had once decayed into a kleptocracy, only to be revived into a democracy once again, it means the country is just as capable of future decay; if bad rulers are once again at the top. As Professor Francis Fukuyama said, if state can be formed, it too can “decay.”

To prevent decay from setting in, Malaysia needs to look at the three areas where the people will take “order” for granted.

Firstly, multi-racial peace cannot be assumed as a given; peaceful and peaceable as most Malaysians are. Thus, the politics of race, as purveyed by Umno and PAS, must be desisted, as they are already allegedly corrupted by vested interest and money, indeed to save themselves from being put behind bars, rather than to redeem the dignity of the Malays and Malaysia. Their return must be checked at all cost.

Secondly, Malaysians should not further assume that the state is there to extract oil and gas from the ground, export them at a premium, and using such largess to adopt a policy of blind subsidy. Universal Basic Income (UBI) can be considered for all poor people but all able bodied men and women must work hard and smart to adapt themselves to the digitized world.

Thirdly, the politics of Pakatan Harapan, cannot be based on a coalition of the possibility of more creative form of coalitions. Such as the rumours of Hishammuddin Hussein leading a new coalition that eliminates the role of DAP and Amanah.

Pakatan Harapan, especially the Presidential Council, must stay strong, honoring all promises in the election Manifesto, and test themselves against the winds of global economic disruption based on this template.

Reinventing Malaysia means deconstructing old ideas of Malaysia without harming the social contract. And, stick to everything in the manifesto as a run up to the 2023 general election; which among others means honouring the mother of all, delivering what the rakyat wants best encapsulated by the five deliverables:

  1. Mitigating costs of living
  2. Enhancing quality of living through holistic and relevant education, better purchasing power etc
  3. Creation of sustainable and credible jobs
  4. Providing affordable healthcare
  5. Ensuring affordable homes

Businesses also need certainty, not absolute certainty, but reasonable certainty with regards to the right economics policies or direction. According to studies, Malaysia seems to show a high correlation between political leadership and economics performance unlike Japan, South Korea or even Thailand.

Pakatan Harapan needs to address this to attract the right foreign direct investment to re-energise the Malaysian economy. Time and tide wait for no man, as they say.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.