HONG KONG, March 24 — Hong Kong’s new national security law came into force today, putting into immediate effect tough penalties of up to life imprisonment for crimes including treason and insurrection.
The law — commonly referred to as Article 23 — targets five categories of national security crimes and was swiftly passed by Hong Kong’s opposition-free legislature on Tuesday.
The United States, the European Union, Japan and Britain have been among the law’s strongest critics, with UK Foreign Minister David Cameron saying it would “further damage the rights and freedoms” of those in the city.
US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken on Friday expressed “deep concern” that the law could be used to undermine rights and curb dissent, adding it could damage Hong Kong’s reputation as an international finance hub.
But Hong Kong leader John Lee has called the passage of the “Safeguarding National Security Ordinance” a “historic moment”.
He has often cited Hong Kong’s “constitutional responsibility” to create the new legislation as required by the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution since its handover from Britain to China in 1997.
Lee also said the law was necessary to “prevent black-clad violence”, a reference to Hong Kong’s massive and at times violent pro-democracy protests in 2019, which brought hundreds of thousands to the streets demanding greater autonomy from Beijing’s grip.
In response, authorities cracked down on protesters, and Beijing imposed a national security law in 2020 — targeting secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces — which has effectively silenced opposition voices among Hong Kong’s once-vibrant civil society.
Nearly 300 people have been arrested under the 2020 law so far.
But Lee — sanctioned by the United States for his role as security chief during the 2019 protests — has said Article 23 was still needed to “plug” the legislative gaps of Beijing’s law.
Life in prison
Under the new law, penalties run up to life in prison for sabotage endangering national security, treason and insurrection; 20 years for espionage and sabotage; and 14 years for external interference.
It has also expanded the British colonial-era offence of “sedition” to include inciting hatred against China’s Communist Party leadership, with an aggravated sentence of up to 10 years in jail.
City leader Lee is now empowered to create new offences carrying jail terms of up to seven years through subsidiary legislation, while the security minister can impose punitive measures on activists who are overseas, including cancelling their passports.
Police powers have also been expanded to permit detaining people for up to 16 days without charge — a jump from the current 48 hours — and to restrict a suspect from meeting lawyers and communicating with others.
The United Kingdom and Australia on Friday updated their travel advice to warn citizens about the risks of breaching the new law when travelling to Hong Kong.
Former US House speaker Nancy Pelosi said at a Friday press conference that the new law was an “alarming expansion of the Chinese Communist Party’s assault on freedom in Hong Kong”.
A previous attempt by the government to introduce Article 23 in 2003 was dropped after half a million Hong Kongers protested it.
This time, public response in the city was muted but protests are expected worldwide.
In London, where a large Hong Kong diaspora relocated after the government’s crackdown on the 2019 protests, around 100 demonstrators gathered outside the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office on Saturday, chanting “Free Hong Kong”.
“When journalists approach Hong Kong citizens in Hong Kong, they’re not really willing to share their view because of fear and because of the nature of this Article 23,” said 30-year old protester “J”, one of those who moved in 2019.
“Every time we go back (to Hong Kong) we will have to be more careful.”
Chinese citizens were also present, including “Fernando”, a 23-year-old student from near Shanghai.
“As a Chinese citizen, I want China to be democratic and have the rule of law, so I have some moral motivation to support them,” he told AFP.
When asked about the risk of being surveilled, he replied: “I think they are looking, they are everywhere. You see a lot of people here they wear the masks and the sunglasses, including me.” — AFP
