WASHINGTON, July 28 — The Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump the go-ahead to divert Pentagon funds to build a border wall with Mexico, a big boost for the US leader’s pet project that has faced controversy since its inception.
In August 2014, some 10 months before announcing his presidential bid, Trump let loose on Twitter with his now familiar refrain: “SECURE THE BORDER! BUILD A WALL!”
Below is an explanation of the ensuing tug-of-war between Congress, the courts and the commander-in-chief:
A campaign promise
Announcing his candidacy for president at Trump Tower in June 2015, Trump made derogatory statements about immigrants from Mexico.
“They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people,” he said.
Building the southern border wall became a central campaign promise as Trump found success in the primaries, and ultimately won the general election.
On January 25, 2017, five days after taking office, Trump issued an executive order directing the Department of Homeland Security to identify and allocate funding for “planning, designing and constructing” the barrier along the US-Mexico border.
Difficulties with Congress
Trump initially claimed that Mexico would pay for the wall, which never occurred. By December 2018, the president maintained that the United States’ southern neighbour would ultimately pay for the barrier through a renegotiated North American free trade deal.
Additionally, Trump asked Congress for US$5.7 billion (RM23.5 billion) in border wall funding.
An onslaught of political battles between the Republican administration and Democratic opposition, which regained control of the House of Representatives in the November 2018 midterm elections, ensued.
After a face-off that included a record 35-day federal government shutdown, Trump reluctantly signed a spending bill that included appropriations of just US$1.4 billion for border barriers.
To remedy the shortfall, he declared a national emergency on February 15, 2019 to build the wall, setting into play a series of court battles that are still underway.
The White House says the emergency order empowers it to pull around US$6.6 billion from other sources, mostly already allocated funds in the Defence Department budget.
Looking forward, the White House has laid out an ambitious 2020 budget proposal which contains US$8.6 billion in new wall funding, considerably above the US$5.7 billion originally requested.
Both chambers of Congress voted to overturn Trump’s emergency declaration, but were unable to muster enough votes to override his veto.
About 20 US states along with rights and environmental groups and border communities are backing lawsuits that claim the emergency declaration violates the Constitution.
In May 2019, a California judge blocked the president’s emergency declaration.
Trump then turned to the Supreme Court which ruled 5-4 in his favour on Friday, writing that the government had “made a sufficient showing at this stage” that the groups did not have the standing to challenge the allocation of funds. This freed up the money for the president’s use while litigation proceeds.
Variable size, shape
About a third of the 3,200 kilometre US-Mexico border is already secured by wall, fence or barbed wire, with the Rio Grande River forming a natural barrier along other stretches.
Trump’s executive order defines the proposed wall as “a contiguous, physical wall or other similarly secure, contiguous, and impassable physical barrier.” At one point he said it would be made with prefabricated concrete panels reinforced with steel rods.
Eight prototypes of concrete and steel were unveiled on the edge of San Diego at the border with Tijuana, Mexico in October 2017, and were subsequently inspected by Trump himself. After testing and evaluation, they were torn down 16 months later. — AFP