Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Motorola Razr: Which foldable is more durable? (VIDEO)

Samsung owned up to the design flaws of the Fold, and subsequently spent a few months rectifying the issues before releasing an updated Galaxy Fold. — Reuters pic
Samsung owned up to the design flaws of the Fold, and subsequently spent a few months rectifying the issues before releasing an updated Galaxy Fold. — Reuters pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 12 — When it comes to foldable phones, most people have qualms when it comes to durability. And for good reason, with the Samsung Galaxy Fold — one of the first smartphones to be available globally — suffering from some serious issues when seeded out to reviewers. 

Samsung owned up to the design flaws of the Fold, and subsequently spent a few months rectifying the issues before releasing an updated Galaxy Fold.

And now that Motorola has released a foldable phone of their own — the classic-looking Motorola Razr — the folks over at CNET saw fit to put both foldables to a durability test, with the help of a machine called the “FoldBot”.

The results aren’t exactly promising, it must be said. The SquareTrade FoldBot machine repeatedly folds and unfolds the phones, with the Samsung Galaxy Fold lasting for around 120,000 folds before it broke down.

However, the Motorola Razr suffered a breakdown of sorts after just 27,218 folds. This means that it stopped folding properly, although remarkably, the phone still appeared to be fully functional.

The Galaxy Fold stress test was done late last year, while the Motorola Razr was just tested in February. However, Motorola responded to the findings, disputing the suitability of SquareTrade’s FoldBot to test the Motorola Razr:

“[The] razr is a unique smartphone, featuring a dynamic clamshell folding system unlike any device on the market. SquareTrade’s FoldBot is simply not designed to test our device.

Therefore, any tests run utilizing this machine will put undue stress on the hinge and not allow the phone to open and close as intended, making the test inaccurate.

The important thing to remember is that razr underwent extensive cycle endurance testing during product development, and CNET’s test is not indicative of what consumers will experience when using razr in the real-world. We have every confidence in the durability of razr.”

Motorola raised the point that the FoldBot machine is designed to test the Galaxy Fold, while parent company SquareTrade is an American company that offers warranties for consumer electronics.

The FoldBot was modified to work with the Razr, which Motorola says is the reason for “undue stress” being put on the Razr’s hinge.

At the same time, I think a caveat to the test is that a human user (especially one that spent a tidy sum on a foldable smartphone) isn’t going to fold their phones with such ferocity, or at such a high frequency.

But the machine test still offers an idea about the comparative durability of the Motorola Razr and other foldable smartphones.

For now, I think it’s safe to assume that durability isn’t really a strength of foldable phones. — SoyaCincau

Related Articles