BEIJING, May 20 — China accused the United States today of harbouring “extravagant expectations” for a trade deal, underlining the gulf between the two sides as US action against China’s technology giant Huawei began hitting the global tech sector.
Adding to bilateral tension, the US military said one of its warships sailed near the disputed Scarborough Shoal claimed by China in the South China Sea yesterday, the latest in a series of “freedom of navigation operations” to anger Beijing.
Alphabet Inc’s Google has also suspended business with China’s Huawei Technologies Co Ltd that requires the transfer of hardware, software and technical services, except those publicly available via open source licensing, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Sunday, in a blow to the company that the US government has sought to blacklist around the world.
Shares in European chipmakers Infineon Technologies, AMS and STMicroelectronics fell sharply on Monday amid worries the Huawei suppliers may suspend shipments to the Chinese firm due to the US blacklisting of it last week.
The Trump administration’s addition of Huawei to a trade blacklist on Thursday immediately enacted restrictions that will make it extremely difficult for it to do business with US counterparts.
In an interview with Fox News Channel recorded last week and aired last night, Trump said the United States and China “had a very strong deal, we had a good deal, and they changed it. And I said ‘that’s OK, we’re going to tariff their products’.”
In Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said he didn’t know what Trump was talking about.
“We don’t know what this agreement is the United States is talking about. Perhaps the United States has an agreement they all along had extravagant expectations for, but it’s certainly not a so-called agreement that China agreed to,” he told a daily news briefing.
The reason the last round of China-US talks did not reach an agreement is because the United States tried “to achieve unreasonable interests through extreme pressure”, Lu said.
“From the start this wouldn’t work.”
China went into the last round of talks with a sincere and constructive attitude, he said.
“I would like to reiterate once again that China-US economic and trade consultation can only follow the correct track of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefit for there to be hope of success.”
No further trade talks between top Chinese and US trade negotiators have been scheduled since the last round ended on May 10 — the same day Trump raised the tariff rate on US$200 billion (RM836 billion) worth of Chinese products from 10 per cent.
Trump took the step after the United States said China backtracked on commitments in a draft deal that had been largely agreed to.
Since then, China has struck a sterner tone, suggesting that a resumption of talks aimed at ending the 10-month trade war between the world’s two largest economies was unlikely to happen soon.
Beijing has said it will take “necessary measures” to defend the rights of Chinese companies but has not said whether or how it will retaliate over the US actions against Huawei.
The editor of the Global Times, an influential tabloid run by the ruling Communist Party’s People’s Daily, tweeted today that he had switched to a Huawei phone, although he said his decision did not mean that he thinks it is right to boycott Apple and said he was not throwing away his iPhone.
“While the US spares no efforts to subdue Huawei, out of personal belief, I chose to support the well-respected company by using its product,” Hu Xijin tweeted.
Trump, who said the interview with Fox News host Steve Hilton had taken place two days after he raised the tariffs, said he would be happy to simply keep tariffs on Chinese products, but said that he believed that China would eventually make a deal with the United States “because they’re getting killed with the tariffs”.
But he said that he had told Chinese President Xi Jinping before the most recent rounds of talks that any deal could not be “50-50” between the two countries and had to be more in favour of the United States because of past trade practices by China. — Reuters