Malaysia
Police probe involving Caprice over alleged document disclosure now under DPP review
Jeyenderan, the chief executive officer of Maritime Network Sdn Bhd, lodged the report at the Ampang Jaya District Police Headquarters on Sept 3 last year over the alleged disclosure of an official document by social media personality Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri

 

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 4 — An investigation paper (IP) into a police report lodged by businessman Datuk Seri R. Jeyenderan over the alleged disclosure of an official document is now under review by the Selangor Deputy Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Jeyenderan’s lawyer, Muniandy Vestanathan, said his firm had received a letter dated Aug 28, 2026, signed by Selangor Criminal Investigation Department chief SAC Zulkarnain Samsudin, on the status of the investigation.

“The letter stated that the IP was sent to the Selangor Deputy Public Prosecutor’s Office on July 28, 2026, for advice and further instructions, and is currently under legal review by the office,” he told Malay Mail. 

Muniandy said the letter indicated that the investigation was being conducted under Section 203A of the Penal Code, which concerns disclosure of information, and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.

Jeyenderan, the chief executive officer of Maritime Network Sdn Bhd, lodged the report at the Ampang Jaya District Police Headquarters on Sept 3 last year over the alleged disclosure of an official document by social media personality Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli.

“My client made the report on Sept 3 last year and it has been a year since we have been waiting for a response. We are therefore seeking an update on the current status of the case and whether any further instructions have been issued by the DPP’s Office,” Muniandy said.

The police investigation is separate from civil proceedings involving Jeyenderan and Ariz, which Muniandy said are scheduled to begin in February 2027 at the Kuala Lumpur High Court.

The allegations have not been established in court, and no finding of criminal wrongdoing has been made against Ariz in relation to the investigation, which remains subject to the relevant legal and prosecutorial processes.

 

Related Articles

 

You May Also Like