TOKYO, July 17 — The Japanese government faced potentially damaging blowback today after barring Tokyo residents from claiming a travel subsidy that is aimed at reviving a domestic tourism industry hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s US$16 billion (RM68.3 billion) “Go To” tourism campaign was intended to promote travel across the country, but officials agreed yesterday to exclude the capital after recent record numbers of coronavirus infections there.
Abe has borne the brunt of the negative reaction to the backflip, adding to growing criticisms of his handling of the crisis that analysts said could erode his support.
“What makes you think that business trips or commuting won’t spread the coronavirus? Do you think it’s fair to exclude Tokyoites from a campaign that’s using taxpayers money?” said opposition lawmaker Ren Ho today morning in a tweet addressed to Abe.
The hashtag #TokyoExcluded was trending on Twitter today, amassing almost 100,000 tweets.
Tourism Minister Kazuyoshi Akaba said the decision to exclude Tokyo residents from receiving a 50 per cent government subsidy for domestic trips was “heart-breaking.” The subsidy, which kicks in from July 22, will also not be available for anybody travelling to Tokyo.
“The decision was made comprehensively by the government with input from experts,” Akaba told a news conference.
Some critics have said the entire tourism campaign, which also includes subsidies for dining in restaurants and shopping expeditions, should be scrapped given the risk of spreading the coronavirus.
“Originally, the travel campaign was premised on the pandemic having been contained, but they (the Abe government) tried to push it through anyway. They excluded Tokyo, but cases are increasing nationally,” said Tomoaki Iwai, political science professor at Nihon University.
“They are misreading the situation,” Iwai said. “They ran ahead with trying to revive the economy.”
“Voters feel that the prime minister’s office is not making appropriate policy,” creating a feeling of mistrust, Iwai added.
Steven Reed, professor emeritus at Chuo University, said Tokyo’s exclusion “adds to the number of examples of Abe’s incompetence in governing.”
Abe’s perceived missteps in his handling of the pandemic have included a much derided decision to distribute two cloth masks to each household and a last minute change to a household cash handout programme.
“He is certainly not leading in any way like he was before,” Reed said, although he acknowledged the impact on Abe’s support was hard to predict given voters routinely cite a lack of a viable alternative.
Yasutoshi Nishimura, the economic revival minister who is tasked with leading coronavirus containment efforts, last week said Japan had successfully contained the virus without a harsh economic lockdown. In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, Nishimura cited contact tracing efforts that helped quash transmission clusters.
However, Tokyo was responsible for almost half the 600 new Covid-19 infections reported yesterday, Japan’s highest one-day increase in three months. Japan has reported a total of around 23,000 cases, including nearly 1,000 deaths.
Top government spokesman Yoshihide Suga said Tokyo could be still be included in the travel subsidy programme if infection numbers recede, but also cautioned its exclusion from the dining out subsidies and others was “under consideration.”
Data out this week underscored the plight of the domestic tourism industry, showing just 4 million international visitors in the first half of the year, a tenth of the government’s full-year target of 40 million. — Reuters