Trump's Justice nominee faces questions over Russia probe

Incoming Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (right) meets with US Attorney General nominee William Barr in Washington January 9, 2019. — Reuters pic
Incoming Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (right) meets with US Attorney General nominee William Barr in Washington January 9, 2019. — Reuters pic

WASHINGTON, Jan 13 — President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Department of Justice, Bill Barr, faces tough questions in the Senate next week on whether he intends to curb Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia collusion investigation.

After the conservative lawyer criticised Mueller last year, opposition Democrats fear Barr as attorney general will protect Trump from the investigation and a possible impeachment effort arising from it.

Mueller has spent 20 months investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, and possible collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia, in a probe increasingly focused on Trump and his inner circle.

Mueller has issued indictments for 33 individuals, most of them Russians, and secured convictions of three former top Trump aides.

Barr, a longtime Republican ally who served as attorney general once before from 1991-93, will go before the Senate Judiciary Committee in confirmation hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday. Democrats want him to pledge publicly to protect the investigation.

Barr's approval is likely, given the Republican majority in the committee and the full Senate.

Senators who spoke to Barr in private meetings say he has indicated that he will not interfere with Mueller, but that he also supports Trump using his executive powers to defend himself.

“I think the main thing people want to know is, what's his view of the Mueller investigation?” said the Judiciary Committee's Republican Chairman Lindsey Graham, after meeting with Mueller on Wednesday.

“I can assure you, based on what I heard, that he has a high opinion of Mr Mueller.”

He echoed Trump claims

Barr “has no reason for Mr Mueller to stop doing his job, and is committed to allowing Mr Mueller to finish,” he added.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, the senior Democrat on the committee, said Thursday that Barr had told her he would not disrupt the probe, according to media reports. But the Washington Times quoted her as saying: “I don't take to the bank anything unless it is in the public sector and everyone can hear, and it's on the record.”

Trump nominated Barr in December, a month after sacking Jeff Sessions, who irked the president by recusing himself from overseeing the Mueller probe, which Trump labels a “witch hunt.”

Barr has a record of endorsing strong executive powers, which could play into high-stakes legal battles on everything from immigration policy, to war powers, to whether the president can be required to provide testimony or release privileged documents in the Russia investigation.

He expressed support in May 2017 when Trump fired then-FBI director James Comey, which has led Mueller to allegations that Trump obstructed justice.

He has also echoed Trump's own claims that Mueller's team is packed with investigators allied with the Democratic Party.

Barr himself, though, is a strong Republican supporter. Over the past two decades he and his wife donated nearly US$800,000 (RM3.27 million) to Republican candidates and groups, according to the Washington Post.

Memo criticised Mueller probe

Last year, he submitted an unsolicited legal criticism of the Mueller probe to the Justice Department, and reportedly to the White House.

It argued that Trump's presidential prerogatives are protection against any obstruction allegation in the Comey firing.

The memo in particular has focused the opposition to Barr's nomination.

Barr is “fatally conflicted... when it comes to the special counsel,” Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, said, calling for Trump to withdraw the nomination.

The biggest concern is what Barr will do with the report Mueller is expected to prepare on his findings.

According to the Washington Post, the president's lawyers are already planning to use executive privilege to stifle material that could be damaging to Trump or support an impeachment effort by Democrats.

Graham said Barr indicated he would be “erring on the side of transparency.” — AFP

Related Articles