SEPTEMBER 14 — The Taman Tugu Project is a not-for-profit corporate social responsibility  initiative led by Khazanah Nasional Berhad (“Khazanah”) with the support of public sector agencies, private sector and civil-society organisations. It conserves a 66-acre prime land green-lung in the heart of the city and open to public for free.

Initial proposal was for a profit-oriented tourist attraction theme-park while other developers were pursuing it for commercial development. After various community engagements Khazanah decided to convert the site into a public park and transfer it into Amanah Warisan Negara (“AWAN”) to be managed and protected into perpetuity as a public green space.  

Reviews by Tripadvisor.com include “Awesome recreation spot”, “Excellent public green forest park”and “A gem in the city”. The former Khazanah managing director engaged the public and relevant stakeholders on details of the ‘taman’.

This is a place that can be enjoyed by all and not by developers with excessive and intense desire for profit.

Advertisement

How about Taman Rimba Kiara (TRK)?

Last month, the developer, Malton Group produced an advertorial committing to sustainable development and not encroaching into TRK.

Yayasan Wilayah Persekutuan (YWP) and Memang Perkasa Sdn Bhd (MPSB), subsidiary of Malton Berhad (Malton), signed a joint-venture agreement in 2014. YWP and Bukit Kiara longhouse settlers (TTDI longhouse settlers) signed a Master Resettlement Agreement (MRA) in 2015. Subsequently, DBKL approved and issued a Development Order (DO) for 12 acres.

Advertisement

The advertorial showed the total land size is reduced from 12 to 8 acres and the apartment blocks reduced by 50 per cent. In creating a harmonious development in the communities they operate, the developer will contribute 4 acres to the community. The longhouse settlers’ rights remain protected besides a larger land size allocated for the existing temple.

However, a photo of the scaled-down version shows the land area and number of units for RUMAWIP are reduced and land size for the temple remained the same but the land for the serviced apartment reduced by 20 per cent only.

Funny thing about this controversial project is the Federal Territories minister (FTM), since March 2019, wanted the dispute to be decided by the Cabinet.

But there is an appeal against a High Court decision in November 2018 that says DBKL’s DO was proper and valid. The Court of Appeal’s hearing on Sept 10 was postponed to November. Whatever the decision, the case may escalate to the Federal Court.

Also, despite multiple reports lodged, an MACC investigation that has taken so long is still outstanding.

The FTM said TTDI residents are staying in beautiful houses; what about the fate of the longhouse settlers?

I think the FTM forgot a few facts. TTDI residents do not want all the 25 acres and had compromised that development can take place at the present longhouse site.

Volunteer architects had planned for townhouses, costing around RM25 million, to be built on the existing longhouse land. If DBKL can spend a lot more for the Bangsar-Damansara elevated highway to cater for a massive high-end project by Malton, why can’t they do the same here to fulfil a 37-year promise to the longhouse settlers?

I hope everyone will take the cue from Khazanah on community engagements and protect ‘tamans’ into pertuity and wish DBKL will start planting our national tree, the Merbau at the controversial site, TRK.

“Once destroyed, nature’s beauty cannot be repurchased at any price” -  Ansel Adams.

What say you…

*This is the personal opinion of the writer and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.