UK top court rules Uber drivers entitled to workers’ rights

The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling that the drivers were workers followed a years-long legal battle with the Silicon Valley taxi and delivery company. — Reuters pic
The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling that the drivers were workers followed a years-long legal battle with the Silicon Valley taxi and delivery company. — Reuters pic

Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on news you need to know.


LONDON, Feb 19 — Britain’s top court today ruled that drivers at US ride-hailing giant Uber are entitled to workers’ rights, in a judgement with huge implications for the “gig economy”.

The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling that the drivers were workers followed a years-long legal battle with the Silicon Valley taxi and delivery company.

“This has been a gruelling four-year legal battle for our members—but it’s ended in a historic win,” said Mick Rix, from the GMB trade union.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of three previous courts, backing up what GMB has said all along; Uber drivers are workers and entitled to breaks, holiday pay and minimum wage,” he added.

Uber said it respected the ruling, “which focussed on a small number of drivers who used the Uber app in 2016.”

“We are committed to doing more and will now consult with every active driver across the UK to understand the changes they want to see,” Jamie Heywood, its manager for Northern and Eastern Europe, said in a statement. 

Lower courts ruled in 2016, 2017 and 2018 in favour of a group of 20 Uber drivers who argued they were entitled to employee status given the length of time they had been working through the Uber app, and the way that the company oversaw their work.

Uber insisted that the drivers were self-employed since they choose their own hours and place of work, and often find passengers through rival apps.

The complainants can now ask an employment tribunal for compensation and it could trigger far-reaching changes affecting all ride-hailing drivers.

“GMB will now consult with our Uber driver members over their forthcoming compensation claim,” said Rix.

‘Nail in coffin’ 

The ruling could also affect other online platforms behind the so-called gig economy in Britain—people doing short-term work without formal contracts, or working without guaranteed hours.

The decision was “another nail in the coffin” for the gig economy, tweeted Rix.

Couriers for the Deliveroo food app are currently fighting in the Court of Appeal in London for the right to collective bargaining.

Uber claimed that it has changed the way it works since the legal action began.

Drivers can now choose when and where they drive and can also access free health insurance as well as compensation for parental leave, it said.

Ahead of the court ruling, Uber vowed to increase protection for drivers while keeping them self-employed.

Uber chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi on Monday presented a series of promises to European governments and trade unions.

He said the aim was to offer a transparent and fair pay structure, and more benefits to drivers.

Uber is calling for companies in the sector to form a joint fund that would allow drivers who work for different apps to be able to access protections and benefits such as paid holidays.

Uber plans to replicate in Europe proposals it first made in California, after a court in the US state ordered the platform to classify its tens of thousands of drivers as employees.

But voters in November then backed Proposition 22, a measure designed by Uber and other gig companies that would mean drivers remained independent contractors while receiving some benefits.

Today’s decision is not expected to affect Uber’s right to operate in London, which has been subject to a separate dispute.

The platform last September regained the right in London for 18 months, after a court overruled a decision by city authorities to suspend its licence due to concerns over passenger security. — AFP

Related Articles